“Buying Your First Home”
   Presented by YAHOO

Home ownership is the cornerstone of the American Dream. But before you start looking, there are a number of things you need to consider. First, you should determine what your needs are and whether owning your own home will meet those needs. Do you picture yourself mowing the lawn on Saturday, or leaving your urban condo for the beach? The best advice is to look at buying a home as a lifestyle investment, and only secondly as a financial investment.

Even if housing prices don’t continue to increase at the torrid pace seen in recent years in many areas, buying a home can be a good financial investment. Making mortgage payments forces you to save, and after 15 to 30 years you will own a substantial asset that can be converted into cash to help fund retirement or a child’s education. There are also tax benefits.

Like many other investments, however, real estate prices can fluctuate considerably. If you aren’t ready to settle down in one spot for a few years, you probably should defer buying a home until you are. If you are ready to take the plunge, you’ll need to determine how much you can spend and where you want to live.

CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes.com

Congratulations! You are first time buyer. Welcome to your home buying guide. Here are a few things to bear in mind when considering this important step in your life:

• Deposit: The first thing to be aware of is that most lenders will look favorably on you having a cash deposit to put down on a property. This deposit can range from 5-15% of the purchase price. If you were buying a property for $300,000, an expected deposit would range from $15,000-$35,000. In certain cases, a lower or higher down payment may be necessary.
• Find a REALTOR®: Don’t buy a home without one. Besides helping you find the home of your dreams, a REALTOR® assists you with every aspect of your homebuying experience. From appraisals to inspections, contracts to disclosures, questions and concerns, our sales professional are experts in the industry and are eager to help you every step of the way.
• Credit Score: As a first time buyer, your credit score will be used to determine your loan and interest rate options. Credit scores range from 340 to 820. The higher your credit score, the better your loan and interest rate options will be. Guarantee Pacific Mortgage, our in-house lender, specializes in helping first time buyers and can provide you with financial assistance you’ll need to purchase your first home.
• Mortgage Payments: Make sure you know what your interest rate is. Many first time buyers go for a fixed rate so they know exactly how much their total mortgage each month.
• Bills: Buying and maintaining a property is not just about keeping up with the mortgage payments; it is also about paying your bills. Besides your mortgage payment, you will be responsible for gas, electric, water, and sewage bills, not to mention other household amenities (i.e. telephone, television and internet bills). Plan in advance for these costs to make sure you can afford to pay them each month.
• The Rewards: Once you have bought your first home, you can enjoy the benefits of freedom and independence. You will soon discover that it is the best thing you ever did, not just in terms of doing as you please, but also that financially you have made a start in paying back the biggest investment of your life. With property prices seen to be rising higher in the coming years make no mistake that your home will become your most valuable possession. Congratulations and enjoy your new home!

Your Realtor,
CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes

Home Refinance and Loan Modification Plan
Presented by the California Association of Realtors

On March 4, 2009, the Obama Administration released detailed guidelines for homeowners to help them determine if they qualify for the Administration’s new Making Home Affordable plan.  This is a follow up to the Administration’s announcement on February 18 outlining their plan to stem the current tide of foreclosures and stabilize the nation’s housing markets.  

The plan has two primary goals:

1.To help homeowners in existing Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans that are current on their mortgage payments to refinance and take advantage of today’s lower interest rates.  Many of these homeowners are unable to refinance because of lost appreciation in their homes due to the continuing decline in home prices.  These homeowners still have equity in their home, just not the necessary 20% to get a refinance.  Under the Administration’s plan, Fannie and Freddie will be allowed to refinance qualified homeowners up to a 105 percent loan-to-value of the current value of the home.

2. To help homeowners who are at risk of foreclosure. The Administration is offering loan servicers and investors government assistance to help offset the cost of modifying qualified homeowners into affordable mortgages that will allow them to keep their homes. This may be done by reducing the mortgage interest rate, extending the term of the loan, principal forbearance, and/or principal cram down. This program is voluntary and the servicers must agree to contracts with the Treasury to participate.

In addition, the Government warns homeowners to beware of foreclosure rescue scams:

 - There should never be a fee charged for information or assistance regarding the Making Home Affordable Program.

 - Beware of anyone who says they can “save” your home if you sign or transfer over the deed to your home. Do not sign over the deed to your property to any organization or individual unless you are working directly with your mortgage company to forgive your debt.

 - Never make your mortgage payment to anyone other than your mortgage company without their approval.

Thanks,
CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
www.CentralValleyHomes.com

Home Refinance and Loan Modification Plan
Presented by the California Association of Realtors

On March 4, 2009, the Obama Administration released detailed guidelines for homeowners to help them determine if they qualify for the Administration’s new Making Home Affordable plan.  This is a follow up to the Administration’s announcement on February 18 outlining their plan to stem the current tide of foreclosures and stabilize the nation’s housing markets.  

The plan has two primary goals:

1.To help homeowners in existing Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans that are current on their mortgage payments to refinance and take advantage of today’s lower interest rates.  Many of these homeowners are unable to refinance because of lost appreciation in their homes due to the continuing decline in home prices.  These homeowners still have equity in their home, just not the necessary 20% to get a refinance.  Under the Administration’s plan, Fannie and Freddie will be allowed to refinance qualified homeowners up to a 105 percent loan-to-value of the current value of the home.

2. To help homeowners who are at risk of foreclosure. The Administration is offering loan servicers and investors government assistance to help offset the cost of modifying qualified homeowners into affordable mortgages that will allow them to keep their homes. This may be done by reducing the mortgage interest rate, extending the term of the loan, principal forbearance, and/or principal cram down. This program is voluntary and the servicers must agree to contracts with the Treasury to participate.

In addition, the Government warns homeowners to beware of foreclosure rescue scams:

 - There should never be a fee charged for information or assistance regarding the Making Home Affordable Program.

 - Beware of anyone who says they can “save” your home if you sign or transfer over the deed to your home. Do not sign over the deed to your property to any organization or individual unless you are working directly with your mortgage company to forgive your debt.

 - Never make your mortgage payment to anyone other than your mortgage company without their approval.

Thanks,
CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
www.CentralValleyHomes.co

m

Interest in FHA purchase loans up

By Inman News, January 19th

Mortgage applications fell 38.8 percent last week as interest rates on most loans remained elevated above recent lows, the Mortgage Bankers Association said.

Applications for refinance loans fell 48 percent from the previous week during the week ending Jan. 23, while applications for purchase loans were off a more modest 2.9 percent, the MBA said.

While applications for conventional purchase loans were down 7.8 percent, applications for loans covered by government guarantee programs (largely FHA) were up 8.8 percent. The numbers were seasonally adjusted and also took into account the shortened holiday week.

Refinance loans represented a smaller share of total applications last week — 72.8 percent, compared with 83.3 percent the previous week. The share of applications for adjustable-rate mortgages rose to 2.4 percent, up from 1.5 percent the week before.

The MBA’s weekly application survey of members showed the average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 5.22 percent from 5.24 percent the week before, with points decreasing to 1.05 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loans.

The average contract interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 4.98 percent from 4.99 percent, with points decreasing to 1.13 from 1.2 for 80 percent LTV loans.

The average contract interest rate for one-year ARMs increased to 5.96 percent from 5.89 percent, with points decreasing to 0.06 from 0.07.

Search for Foreclosure Homes at wwwCentralValleyHomes.com 

CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes.com

Rule changes could cut into industry profits

BY MATT CARTER, INMAN NEWS

Consumers will be less likely to accept overpriced loans, title insurance and other services — including those offered by businesses affiliated with real estate brokerages and builders — once new loan disclosure forms and settlement procedures are fully in place at the end of next year.

That’s according to a lengthy review by the Department of Housing and Urban Development of its proposed rule changes governing enforcement of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

In publishing a final rule in Monday’s Federal Register, HUD detailed numerous “significant” changes to its proposed overhaul of RESPA in response to feedback from industry and consumer groups.

When they announced the new rule last week, HUD officials emphasized concessions they made to the real estate industry trade groups, who were highly critical of the rule changes as first proposed in March. Industry critics said HUD has overestimated the extent to which consumers will comparison shop, and underestimated the unintended consequences of the rule change, such as consolidation.

HUD’s response to the criticism included dropping a requirement that consumers be read a lengthy script at the closing table, and shortening the standardized good faith estimate (GFE) from four pages to three.

More crucially, perhaps, HUD toned down but did not abandon measures intended to encourage consumers to shop for the best deal and create more competition between lenders and settlement services providers. The measures still in place could have a dramatic impact on the way those products are marketed and sold to consumers.

The overall goal of the new, standardized GFE is helping consumers compare different loan packages, HUD said. The new disclosures and procedures will empower consumers to compare not only the rates and terms of different mortgage offers, but the price services required by most lenders, such as title insurance.

Slack on tolerances

HUD said one way it is helping consumers comparison shop is by imposing tolerances on how much prices and fees quoted in the GFE can change before borrowers reach the closing table. Loan origination fees can’t change at all, and fees for required services won’t be permitted to change by more than 10 percent when they are provided by a company selected by the lender.

Trade groups representing lenders and settlement service providers were generally opposed to tolerances when they were proposed by HUD in March. In order to minimize the risk of violating the tolerances, some said, big lenders would have to contract with large settlement service providers, driving small companies out of business and reducing competition.

HUD said accurate estimates are crucial to empowering consumers to shop for the best deal, protecting them from “low-ball” offers that change at the last minute. But HUD said it did not intend to punish loan originators for unforeseen changes in a borrower’s circumstances or other factors beyond their control, such as government recording charges.

HUD says the final rule provides some additional leeway for fees to change due to unforeseen circumstances. If there are changes in the tax rate or the price of the property after the good faith estimate is provided, for example, originators can provide a revised estimate.

While transfer taxes will still subject to a “zero tolerance,” HUD acknowledged that government recording charges may not be be known until closing, and will instead be categorized with other settlement services that can change by 10 percent overall.

HUD will cut lenders some additional slack by giving them up to a month after a closing to correct any failure to achieve the tolerances. The final rule would give loan originators 30 days to “cure” violations by reimbursing the borrower by the amount the tolerances were exceeded.

If that sounds like a slap on the wrist that won’t deter loan originators from engaging in bait-and-switch tactics, HUD says that until Congress grants it additional power to enforce RESPA, it can’t legally impose fines for such violations.

But lenders won’t be able to break the rules with impunity, HUD says, because federal and state banking regulators can punish the companies they license for RESPA violations. In addition, aggrieved borrowers can bring civil suits under RESPA seeking redress, and lenders who sell loans on the secondary market can also be held liable by the investors who buy them if they break rules governing mortgage originations.

In its handling of tolerances, HUD says the final RESPA rule “seeks to balance the borrower’s interest in receiving an accurate GFE early in the application process … with the lender’s interest in maintaining flexibility to address the many issues that can arise in a complex process such as loan origination.”

Presented by
CAROL PERDEW
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes.com

By Jack Guttentag,
Inman News|  

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story erroneously stated that the HOPE NOW Alliance of loan servicers charges borrowers for consultations. The consultations are free.

Q: “I have been giving my clients an article you wrote about a year ago advising borrowers having payment problems how to request a modification in their loan contract … Could you bring it up to date?”

A: A lot has happened since that article was written. Very shortly thereafter, the HOPE NOW program promoted by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson began as an effort by housing counseling agencies and mortgage servicers to modify loans on a strictly voluntary basis. Since then, the first recourse of borrowers in trouble has been to call them at 1-888-995-HOPE. I have sent many people to HOPE NOW, with mixed feedback.

House prices have declined further in the last year, turning more borrowers “upside down” where they owe more on their mortgage than their house is worth. This induces some borrowers to stop making payments, which increases foreclosures. But price declines also reduce the amounts that investors recover from sale of the house following a foreclosure, which should increase the attractiveness of loan modifications as an alternative.

In addition, a full-fledged financial crisis has erupted, forcing the Federal Reserve to act as the lender of last resort to a series of weakened financial firms unable to meet their cash needs. The coverage of deposit insurance has been broadened and money market funds are now insured. In the works, furthermore, are plans to purchase mortgage assets from investors, to make direct equity investments in banks, and even to insure payment of principal and interest on mortgages and other assets.

An excellent study by Alan M. White provides some indications of what has happened to modifications during this tumultuous period. In a sample of subprime loans he examined, the mortgage payment was reduced in only about half the modifications, and the balance was reduced in very few cases. In many cases, the modification consisted of adding the amounts past due (“arrearages”) to the balance, which raises the payment. It is no wonder that during the annual period he examined, the number of foreclosures swamped the number of modifications.

Borrowers having payment trouble have choices. The rational choices are either to seek help immediately, or to take immediate action themselves. Those who put their heads in the sand will lose their home in a foreclosure.

I suggest that those who elect to seek help go to HOPE NOW first, and if that does not work out, to try a HUD-approved counselor. Before seeing a counselor, prepare yourself by pulling together all the data that the counselor will need; the form at Genworth Financial can be used for this purpose.

Responding to a solicitation from one of the many modification consultants who have emerged over the last year is extremely risky. They charge $1,000 and up, usually payable in advance. Some may do a good job, but many are hustlers looking to garner upfront fees.

If you elect to handle the matter yourself, you must get to the servicer’s loss mitigation department, which may take some persistence. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate and document that, for the reasons you lay out, you can no longer make the required payment. You must also demonstrate and document that you can make a smaller payment that you specify.

Under the new FHA program called H4H (“Hope for Homeowners”), FHA will refinance loans of borrowers having payment problems if the existing investor will write down the loan balance to 90 percent of current market value. HUD publishes a list of lenders participating in this program. I am not sure whether there is any benefit to a borrower contacting one of them before the firm servicing their existing loan has agreed to pay down the balance. But it can’t hurt to get that lender on your side.

Aside from the possible increased risk exposure under FHA, the federal government has not channeled any crisis money directly to borrowers. The new programs referred to earlier will direct $700 billion or more to financial institutions, but none to households. A strong case can be made that this is unbalanced.

The root cause of the crisis is the decline in home prices, which will continue so long as the foreclosure problem isn’t solved. Arguably, dealing directly with this problem is more effective than dealing with it indirectly. The Treasury recently put out a request for proposals on a mortgage payment insurance plan, which could be the perfect vehicle for providing direct assistance to borrowers. Stay tuned.

Presented by
CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes.com

Short Sale – Buyer & Broker Beware!
by Walt Harvey
 

“Is it true that mortgage servicers will not help borrowers who are in trouble until they stop making their payments? I am a home retention counselor, and I keep hearing from people referred to me that they have received no response from their servicer because they have not yet missed a payment. I would hate to advise people that they have to stop paying if they expect to get any help if it is not true.”

There is certainly much truth to this because I have heard the same story from numerous people I have counseled, whose stories I have no reason to doubt. The most common thing I hear is that they were told by the servicer to come back when they were two payments behind.

There are understandable reasons why borrowers who are delinquent on their payments receive more prompt consideration than those who are current. To the degree that servicers are faced with more requests for help than they can handle at one time, they have to set priorities. The number of borrowers in trouble has ballooned over the past year, outstripping the efforts of servicers to expand their capacity to deal with them.

Setting Priorities

A plausible way to set priorities is in terms of the degree of urgency of the problem. A borrower 60 days behind in his payment is closer to foreclosure, and if he is going to be saved, he needs faster action than a borrower who is current. So borrowers who are current get placed at the bottom of the list of borrowers requiring special treatment, if they are even placed on the list at all.

This tendency is reinforced by the fear of free-riders. All borrowers would like to get a better deal on their mortgages, whether they have trouble making their current payments or not. If loans are being modified to help borrowers, some borrowers who are not in financial distress will try to take advantage of the situation by pretending that they are. But potential free-riders may not be willing to become delinquent because that would hurt their credit. By only considering modifications for borrowers who are already delinquent, the servicer reduces the number of potential free-riders.

In addition, the practice of dealing only with borrowers who are delinquent keeps loans in good standing for longer periods. Consider the borrower who loses her job but has savings sufficient to cover the payments for some months. Investors would prefer that the borrower make the payment out of savings for as long as possible, since she might find another job during this period, avoiding the need for any modification of the mortgage.

Moving Up on the List

If I were a borrower with reduced income but with good prospects of recovery, I would make the payment out of savings, avoiding the hit to my credit. If I considered the prospects of recovery to be poor, however, I would stop paying and husband my savings. This would move me up on the servicer’s priority list for special treatment. While it also moves up the hit to my credit, that is something that would happen anyway as soon as my savings were exhausted.

If I did not have a problem making the current payment but would have a problem dealing with an anticipated payment increase, I would handle it differently.

First, I would determine exactly how large the payment increase would be. If the increase stemmed from an interest-only loan reaching the end of the interest-only period, the new payment could be found using any monthly payment calculator (including calculator 7a on my Web site) inputting a term equal to the remaining life of the loan. If the increase stemmed from an ARM (adjustable-rate mortgage) adjustment, the new payment wouldn’t be known exactly until a month or two before the adjustment, but an estimate based on the current value of the rate index would provide a good estimate.

A Detailed Budget

Step two is to develop a detailed budget which documents the point that the expected payment is not affordable. Use the form provided by Genworth to show your income, expenses, and assets.

Submit your document to the servicer well in advance of the anticipated payment increase. There is no guarantee that it will lead to a contract modification before the payment increase materializes. However, it gives you a good shot to move up in the servicer’s queue by providing the concrete detailed information that servicers require. It also keeps you out of the hands of the modification hustlers who want to be paid upfront for doing what you can do yourself.

CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes.com

Francesca Levy
Forbes.com

As the dismal U.S. housing market slides further downhill–home prices in July posted a 16.3% annual drop–some sellers are unloading their homes to bargain-hunters.

But in cities like Seattle, Jacksonville, Fla., and St. Louis–the hardest major cities in which to sell a home–even sellers who have substantially lowered their prices aren’t finding it easy to move their houses.

In others, including Philadelphia, Sacramento, Calif., and Las Vegas, plummeting home prices spurred by high foreclosure rates have added more reasonably priced houses and condominiums to the market and sparked a rise in buying and selling.

Factors like banks’ reluctance to lend, the slow movement of foreclosed homes through some state systems and gun-shy buyers in others have restricted selling in many cities. In others, income-squeezed households have a better chance of turning their homes to cash, even if it’s not as much cash as they’d like.

In the second quarter of 2008, the median price of a single-family home dropped 23.6% in Las Vegas from the previous year, to $235,300, according to National Association of Realtors reports. In Washington, D.C., prices fell 16.8% to $370,300, and in Chicago that number went down 9%, to $257,600. 

Behind the Numbers

Radar Logic, a New York City-based real estate data and analytics company, today released housing sales transaction numbers for a sampling of homes in 25 of the country’s major metropolitan areas. This story is based on these numbers.

Of the cities measured, Philadelphia has had by far the steepest increase in home sales, with transactions more than doubling from the same time the previous year. Seattle marks the other end of the sales spectrum, having seen its transaction numbers drop by 43.7% from the previous year. Radar records transactions for sales where complete data were provided.

Although Philadelphia made the top of Radar Logic’s transaction count list in July, Michael Feder, Radar’s president and CEO, warned against interpreting too much from the sharp rise in percentage of transactions for that city.

“It can mean that there’s a more stable market in Philadelphia,” he says. “But sometimes a county will go dark for a month and not file any data from public records sources. Philadelphia is not wonderful in terms of this. So there are not necessarily a lot more transactions there.”

Sacramento, which saw swift sales in July, also had the greatest second-quarter drop in home prices from the previous year of any metropolitan area, with the median price of single-family homes down 35.6% to $229,500. There, and in other nearby cities hardest hit by the subprime disaster, houses have started to move in part because the effects of the foreclosure crisis have had more time to set in.

“In the places hardest hit a year and a half ago, prices have come way down,” says Glenn Kelman, CEO of online real estate broker Redfin Corporation. “In San Diego, Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Sacramento, they have all acknowledged the reality of home prices.”

But in Miami, also a foreclosure-rich area, buyers seem to be holding out for a better deal. Here, the number of sales has dropped 23.2%.

“Miami has a significant oversupply, and people are somewhat waiting it out,” says Rachel Drew, a research analyst at the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. “There’s a lot of stock to move and people are waiting to see where the bottom is.”

Foreclosures play a complex role in the rate of home sales. In cities like Sacramento and Phoenix, foreclosed homes have flooded the market with discounts.

But real estate laws can have as much to do with homes hitting the market as foreclosure rates.

In California and Arizona, the law restricts deficiency judgments–a court’s ability to collect on the remaining value of a foreclosed home once it has been sold. In these states, homeowners with negative equity can walk away from the property, resulting in what some call “jingle letters,” house keys sent to the bank in an envelope. While the practice has consequences for lenders and borrowers, it speeds turnover in a foreclosure-ridden market.

“Lenders get the house back very rapidly and can move to sell the house very rapidly,” says Anthony Sanders, a professor of finance and real estate at Arizona State University. “In other states, deficiency judgments can slow foreclosure markets to a crawl. You go to Georgia and it’s much tougher.”

In Phoenix, which had 9.4% more recorded transactions than the previous year, many foreclosed homes weren’t on the market until recently. Sales of homes owned by banks and other financial institutions were nearly 10 times higher in July than they were the previous year. Sanders says that early in the crisis, banks held on to foreclosed properties.

“Banks, like everyone else, were hoping for a turnaround in the housing market. They were hoping that they could sell a house for more,” he says. “As the evidence comes out that this isn’t happening, they’ve wised up and started reducing house prices to get it out of their inventory.”

Radar Logic’s Feder says that increased sales of foreclosed homes in places like Phoenix and Los Angeles will be good for the market.

“Median prices are affected by these heavily discounted homes. As foreclosed homes are absorbed, we will be left with nonforeclosed homes, and we will start to see stability in the housing market,” he says. “The question is, how long will that take?”

A handful of major cities around the country have seen a sharp rise in transactions, but most are still waiting uneasily for the market to bottom out and buyers are finding loans increasingly difficult to get. In some west coast and Florida cities badly affected by subprime loans and dropping house prices, foreclosed homes are being sold at a faster rate and may be moving those cities toward a housing recovery.

But in New York, whose economy is expected to be hit hard by troubles in the financial services sector, housing prices have just begun to drop, down 5.3% in the second quarter. Sales have dropped 24.5%, suggesting the worst may be yet to come.

Even in stable markets, “less is happening,” says Feder. “It doesn’t necessarily mean buyers have plummeted, it just means buyers and sellers still don’t agree on prices.”

CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
www.CentralValleyHomes.com