New Home Loan Disclosures to Protect Consumers

HUD: Consumers will shop for loans

Rule changes could cut into industry profits

BY MATT CARTER, INMAN NEWS

 

Consumers will be less likely to accept overpriced loans, title insurance and other services — including those offered by businesses affiliated with real estate brokerages and builders — once new loan disclosure forms and settlement procedures are fully in place at the end of next year.

That’s according to a lengthy review by the Department of Housing and Urban Development of its proposed rule changes governing enforcement of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

In publishing a final rule in Monday’s Federal Register, HUD detailed numerous “significant” changes to its proposed overhaul of RESPA in response to feedback from industry and consumer groups.

When they announced the new rule last week, HUD officials emphasized concessions they made to the real estate industry trade groups, who were highly critical of the rule changes as first proposed in March. Industry critics said HUD has overestimated the extent to which consumers will comparison shop, and underestimated the unintended consequences of the rule change, such as consolidation.

HUD’s response to the criticism included dropping a requirement that consumers be read a lengthy script at the closing table, and shortening the standardized good faith estimate (GFE) from four pages to three.

More crucially, perhaps, HUD toned down but did not abandon measures intended to encourage consumers to shop for the best deal and create more competition between lenders and settlement services providers. The measures still in place could have a dramatic impact on the way those products are marketed and sold to consumers.

The overall goal of the new, standardized GFE is helping consumers compare different loan packages, HUD said. The new disclosures and procedures will empower consumers to compare not only the rates and terms of different mortgage offers, but the price services required by most lenders, such as title insurance.

Slack on tolerances

HUD said one way it is helping consumers comparison shop is by imposing tolerances on how much prices and fees quoted in the GFE can change before borrowers reach the closing table. Loan origination fees can’t change at all, and fees for required services won’t be permitted to change by more than 10 percent when they are provided by a company selected by the lender.

Trade groups representing lenders and settlement service providers were generally opposed to tolerances when they were proposed by HUD in March. In order to minimize the risk of violating the tolerances, some said, big lenders would have to contract with large settlement service providers, driving small companies out of business and reducing competition.

HUD said accurate estimates are crucial to empowering consumers to shop for the best deal, protecting them from “low-ball” offers that change at the last minute. But HUD said it did not intend to punish loan originators for unforeseen changes in a borrower’s circumstances or other factors beyond their control, such as government recording charges.

HUD says the final rule provides some additional leeway for fees to change due to unforeseen circumstances. If there are changes in the tax rate or the price of the property after the good faith estimate is provided, for example, originators can provide a revised estimate.

While transfer taxes will still subject to a “zero tolerance,” HUD acknowledged that government recording charges may not be be known until closing, and will instead be categorized with other settlement services that can change by 10 percent overall.

HUD will cut lenders some additional slack by giving them up to a month after a closing to correct any failure to achieve the tolerances. The final rule would give loan originators 30 days to “cure” violations by reimbursing the borrower by the amount the tolerances were exceeded.

If that sounds like a slap on the wrist that won’t deter loan originators from engaging in bait-and-switch tactics, HUD says that until Congress grants it additional power to enforce RESPA, it can’t legally impose fines for such violations.

But lenders won’t be able to break the rules with impunity, HUD says, because federal and state banking regulators can punish the companies they license for RESPA violations. In addition, aggrieved borrowers can bring civil suits under RESPA seeking redress, and lenders who sell loans on the secondary market can also be held liable by the investors who buy them if they break rules governing mortgage originations.

In its handling of tolerances, HUD says the final RESPA rule “seeks to balance the borrower’s interest in receiving an accurate GFE early in the application process … with the lender’s interest in maintaining flexibility to address the many issues that can arise in a complex process such as loan origination.”

Presented by
CAROL PERDEW
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes.com

HOPE NOW Program Is Helping Home Owners

Despite difficulties, homeowners finding relief with HOPE NOW program

By Jack Guttentag,
Inman News|  

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story erroneously stated that the HOPE NOW Alliance of loan servicers charges borrowers for consultations. The consultations are free.

Q: “I have been giving my clients an article you wrote about a year ago advising borrowers having payment problems how to request a modification in their loan contract … Could you bring it up to date?”

A: A lot has happened since that article was written. Very shortly thereafter, the HOPE NOW program promoted by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson began as an effort by housing counseling agencies and mortgage servicers to modify loans on a strictly voluntary basis. Since then, the first recourse of borrowers in trouble has been to call them at 1-888-995-HOPE. I have sent many people to HOPE NOW, with mixed feedback.

House prices have declined further in the last year, turning more borrowers “upside down” where they owe more on their mortgage than their house is worth. This induces some borrowers to stop making payments, which increases foreclosures. But price declines also reduce the amounts that investors recover from sale of the house following a foreclosure, which should increase the attractiveness of loan modifications as an alternative.

In addition, a full-fledged financial crisis has erupted, forcing the Federal Reserve to act as the lender of last resort to a series of weakened financial firms unable to meet their cash needs. The coverage of deposit insurance has been broadened and money market funds are now insured. In the works, furthermore, are plans to purchase mortgage assets from investors, to make direct equity investments in banks, and even to insure payment of principal and interest on mortgages and other assets.

An excellent study by Alan M. White provides some indications of what has happened to modifications during this tumultuous period. In a sample of subprime loans he examined, the mortgage payment was reduced in only about half the modifications, and the balance was reduced in very few cases. In many cases, the modification consisted of adding the amounts past due (“arrearages”) to the balance, which raises the payment. It is no wonder that during the annual period he examined, the number of foreclosures swamped the number of modifications.

Borrowers having payment trouble have choices. The rational choices are either to seek help immediately, or to take immediate action themselves. Those who put their heads in the sand will lose their home in a foreclosure.

I suggest that those who elect to seek help go to HOPE NOW first, and if that does not work out, to try a HUD-approved counselor. Before seeing a counselor, prepare yourself by pulling together all the data that the counselor will need; the form at Genworth Financial can be used for this purpose.

Responding to a solicitation from one of the many modification consultants who have emerged over the last year is extremely risky. They charge $1,000 and up, usually payable in advance. Some may do a good job, but many are hustlers looking to garner upfront fees.

If you elect to handle the matter yourself, you must get to the servicer’s loss mitigation department, which may take some persistence. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate and document that, for the reasons you lay out, you can no longer make the required payment. You must also demonstrate and document that you can make a smaller payment that you specify.

Under the new FHA program called H4H (“Hope for Homeowners”), FHA will refinance loans of borrowers having payment problems if the existing investor will write down the loan balance to 90 percent of current market value. HUD publishes a list of lenders participating in this program. I am not sure whether there is any benefit to a borrower contacting one of them before the firm servicing their existing loan has agreed to pay down the balance. But it can’t hurt to get that lender on your side.

Aside from the possible increased risk exposure under FHA, the federal government has not channeled any crisis money directly to borrowers. The new programs referred to earlier will direct $700 billion or more to financial institutions, but none to households. A strong case can be made that this is unbalanced.

The root cause of the crisis is the decline in home prices, which will continue so long as the foreclosure problem isn’t solved. Arguably, dealing directly with this problem is more effective than dealing with it indirectly. The Treasury recently put out a request for proposals on a mortgage payment insurance plan, which could be the perfect vehicle for providing direct assistance to borrowers. Stay tuned.

The writer is professor of finance emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Comments and questions can be left at www.mtgprofessor.com.

Presented by
CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes.com

 

Short Sales Help Homeowners Without Equity In Their Homes

Here is an informative article about the growing challenge of short sales on the real estate market. Short sales are a solution for homeowners who need to sell without equity in their homes. Selling a home as short sale is an alternative to foreclosure. Since short sales are expected to continue to grow, it is helpful to understand the short sale process. Hope this is helpful!

Short Sale – Buyer & Broker Beware!
by Walt Harvey
 

Recently, more short sale properties have come on the market. A short sale is a situation where a property seller needs to sell and the sale proceeds are not sufficient to pay off the existing mortgage. It is an alternative to foreclosure. The term short sale or short pay refers to a process whereby the mortgage company must agree to a reduced payoff in order for the sale to take place. All sale costs must be included and the seller receives nothing, except debt relief and not having a foreclosure on their credit record.If you’re a prospective buyer on such a property, beware! The seller may accept your offer; you may invest $1000 in an appraisal and a property inspection, but you may not get the property because the mortgage company may not agree to reduce their payoff. The mortgage company is a third entity that is not a party to your contract, yet their decision will affect the outcome of the transaction. The mortgage company will review the short sale proposal and closing the sale will depend on their response.

 

Many short sales fail because the mortgage company representative is unfamiliar with the local market and responds with an unrealistic proposal. When buying a short sale property, don’t expect a quick answer and don’t expect the mortgage company to respond logically. They will seek any additional assets the homeowner may have. They may demand the seller to sign a personal note to pay back the shortfall. Remember, the mortgage company wants to recover as much of the loan as possible and if the property goes to foreclosure, well that’s another department’s problem.

 

Additionally, many loans have PMI (Private Mortgage Insurance) that will cover a portion of their loss so the mortgager’s motivation to reach an agreement may be less because they’re covered regardless. You may have to start negotiating with the PMI Company, adding additional time to the sale process. Unless you have considerable experience with short sales, foreclosures and working with lenders’ loss mitigation departments, be very cautious in submitting an offer on a property in a short sale situation.

 

Buyers, ensure that you have an escape provision if the process takes longer than you want or if a more suitable property becomes available.

 

Sellers, be realistic. Consult with your accountant and your attorney on the tax and legal ramifications of a short sale. You may have to be willing to undergo an asset evaluation and even be willing to walk away and let the lender have the property.

 

Brokers, you will have to work two to three times as hard and may never help your seller clients achieve their goals of a sale, and your buyer clients may go through months of negotiation and several fees but not be able to close successfully on the home of their dreams.

 

Lenders, wake up! Work with the buyers and brokers who can ultimately save you money.
History shows that a property that goes through this process nets less money to the lenders.

 

Walt Harvey, ABR, CIPS, CRB, CRS, GRI, SRES, AHWD, ePRO, QSC, RSPS and TRC, is a real estate Broker who partners with his wife Arla and together they specialize in residential, commercial and investment real estate.

CAROL PERDEW
Prudential California Realty
(209) 239-7979
wwwCentralValleyHomes